![]()
PC Repair Rip-Off!
by Charles Piller
People have been grousing about how much it costs to fix their PCs since the first Altair rolled out of a storefront in Albuquerque, New Mexico, more than 20 years ago. Misleading estimates, rude and occasionally dishonest technicians, and big repair bills seem to be alarmingly typical these days. But are the horror stories just isolated cases?
To find out, PC World conducted a detailed investigation of service stores. Posing as unsophisticated customers, PC World reporters in six cities tested 20 branches of four giant computer chains. After reading this article, you'll never view computer service the same way again.
Best Buy, CompUSA, Computer City, and RadioShack all have bold slogans: "You Have Questions, We Have Answers," trumpets RadioShack. "World Class Customer Service," boasts Computer City. The others are similarly self-assured. Do they live up to their billing? The answer affects a lot of you: These four chains are the biggest companies that repair a wide range of major-brand PCs. Each of them has a strong national presence, repairs computers not purchased in its own stores, and advertises widely. In short, each represents a primary choice for most consumers. According to the trade magazine Computer Retail Week, these chains collectively account for more than one-third of the $29 billion earned last year by the top 100 computer retailers.
And the big four provided a far greater percentage of repair services because many of the top retailers are direct-mail companies (such as Micro Warehouse) or discount houses (such as Costco) that do not repair the machines they sell.
That turns out to be bad news for consumers. Take RadioShack. In our tests, it properly fixed only two PCs in five tries; one store took 25 days to complete work and even then didn't detect the source of the problem. Because RadioShack offers no phone support--for free or fee--perhaps it should change its slogan to the more apt "Don't Ask, Don't Tell."
Unfortunately, RadioShack's dismal performance was far from unique. Stores from every chain wanted to sell us a new hard drive or motherboard (or both) to fix a problem caused by a faulty $7 cable. The common urge to prescribe costly, unneeded parts suggests that naive consumers pay dearly at thousands of stores across the country every day. And few ever realize that they are wasting their money.
Service isn't much good unless your computer gets fixed. But the fix itself is only part of good service. We evaluated five stores from each major chain based on a combination of the key factors in the consumer experience--accuracy, quality, cost, efficiency, and helpfulness.
Service Test: Defining Our Approach
Before setting up our test problems, we verified that each system was in perfect working order. We reformatted each hard drive, then reinstalled Windows 95, along with several applications and dummy files.
How We Tested
PROBLEM 1. To test phone support, we sabotaged each PC's display by renaming the video driver. A good tech should be able to diagnose the problem over the phone and guide a user to a solution: reinstalling the driver.
PROBLEM 2. On 15 of the 20 systems, we damaged the IDE hard drive cable by cutting several of its internal wires. The damage was not visible, but the system wouldn't boot. Correct solution: Replace the IDE cable. On the remaining 5 systems we disabled the CD-ROM audio by cutting the sound cable. Correct solution: Replace the cut cable.
PROBLEM 3. We moved one SIMM in each machine to an incorrect slot, reducing usable system memory from 16MB to 8MB. We didn't tell the technicians that the memory seemed faulty. The PCs ran so slowly, and the wrong order of the SIMMs was so easy to see, we believe a trained person should readily spot this problem.
How We Graded
| Accuracy (20 points maximum in store, 55 phone). Did the store diagnose the problem correctly and without confusion? If so, it scored big; in the few cases where a store got close enough to identifying a problem without clearly defining it, we gave partial credit. |
| Quality (30 points, in store only). Did the store fix the problem? This is the acid test of repair experiences, of course. Without a fix, no store was graded above F. We penalized stores that tried to sell unneeded parts or services.Cost (20 points). Was the final bill fair and consistent with estimates? If so, we gave high marks; overcharges were penalized. |
| Efficiency (15 points). Did the store meet its own completion estimates? If so, we graded it high, even if the PC spent a long time in the shop. But if a store wasted our time with sluggish repairs, communication breakdowns, or long waits on hold, it lost points. |
| Helpfulness (10 points). Were employees instructive and courteous? If so, we gave them their due. Stores with terse, uncommunicative, impatient, or rude techs were marked down. |
| Misplaced SIMM (5 points, in store only). Did the store spot the problem and fix it? |
We gave each store an overall grade based on these criteria, then averaged grades for the five stores within each chain to get a single letter grade as follows:
C = 70 to 79 points
D = 60 to 69 points
F = less than 60 points
Easy Problems? Not for These Stores
Our findings suggest that a service visit to any of the giant chains is not for the faint of heart (for an overview, see Rampant Incompetence: Every Chain Falls Flat; for details, see Service Problems and Phone Support Problem):
| Of 55 problems tested across 20 stores, a total of 30 were misdiagnosed, ignored, or went otherwise unfixed. Best Buy and Computer City each missed on 9 of 15 tries. Given 10 problems to solve, RadioShack missed 6. CompUSA missed on 6 of 15 problems. |
| Only two stores fixed all three problems: the CompUSA superstores in Santa Clara, California, and Woburn, Massachusetts. And even they were not perfect. The Woburn store lost points for inefficiency and lack of helpfulness, and the Santa Clara outlet fell short for suggesting a time-wasting fix for the phone problem. |
| Seven of 15 stores did not meet a minimum level of acceptable service for the phone test (RadioShack doesn't offer phone tech support). Only 3 of 5 Best Buy and 3 of 5 CompUSA stores passed--and one pass in each case was marginal. Only 2 of 5 Computer City stores passed. |
| Ten of 20 stores did not meet a minimum level of acceptable service for the bad cable; no chain solved the problem in more than three of five tries. |
| Thirteen of 20 stores failed to detect the misplaced SIMM; only CompUSA solved the problem three times; Computer City and Best Buy failed in four of five tries. |
| Nine of 20 stores--3 RadioShack outlets and 2 stores from each of the other chains--either replaced or tried to replace parts that were in perfect working order. |
| On cost, Best Buy was best, with charges as low as $20; CompUSA stayed under $100 but charged a minimum of $90. RadioShack and Computer City wanted to bill up to $720 and $605, respectively, for parts and labor we didn't need. |
Precious Few Highlights
In Westminster, Colorado, Best Buy offered superb service for a disabled CD-ROM audio cable. "When I brought it in (with a crying baby, for realism)," our reporter says, "a tech checked all the settings to make sure it wasn't just a software problem. They charged the minimum diagnostic service fee--$19.99--and threw the cable in for free."
In phone support tests, Best Buy and Computer City were uneven when it came to helpfulness, but all except one CompUSA store treated our reporters with complete courtesy and patience. And several stores from these three chains were easily accessible by telephone. What did the best stores do right? First, they listened carefully. Then they seemed to take a methodical approach and didn't jump to conclusions, ruling out obvious possibilities first, and then moving efficiently to the next steps.
| Rampant
Incompetence: Every Chain Falls Flat PC World created hardware and software problems for the four leading national PC chains, testing five stores per chain. The overall performance--for both in-store service and telephone support--was largely abysmal. |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service Problems: Faulty cable and misplaced SIMM | Phone Support Problem: Corrupted video driver | ||||
| Chain | Overall rating | Behind the grades | Overall rating | Behind the grades | |
| Best Buy Second-biggest computer retailer; 285 superstores, $2.77 billion annual hardware sales. |
D | Lived up to its name on cost, very helpful, but diagnoses and
repairs were unreliable. One store tried to sell unneeded hard drive, another replaced system board without permission. Four out of five stores failed to detect the misplaced SIMM. |
D | Two stores aced this question, one passed marginally, and the other two failed. |
|
| CompUSA Top computer retailer; 153 superstores, $3.25 billion annual hardware sales. |
D | Helpful and courteous, but diagnoses unreliable. Three stores
fixed cable problem, but two tried to sell an unneeded system board or hard drive. |
D | Only one store scored well; two charged us without solving the problem. |
|
| Computer City Subsidiary of Tandy; 96 superstores, $1.48 billion annual hardware sales. |
F | Diagnoses were unreliable. Two stores tried to sell an
unneeded system board or RAM. Four out of five stores failed to detect the misplaced SIMM. |
D- | One store advised trashing the graphics card driver, making matters worse; only two stores passed the test. |
|
| RadioShack Owned by Tandy; 5000 stores take in machines for repair; $322 million annual hardware sales. |
F | Only two successful cable repairs and two successful SIMM
fixes. Three stores tried to sell an unneeded system board, hard drive, or antivirus software. Average time in shop: 14 days. |
n/a | No phone support, so consumers can't troubleshoot a problem without a visit to the shop. |
|
| n/a = not applicable SOURCES: Sales figures from Computer Retail Week. Store figures from each chain. |
|||||
Phone Support: A Cautionary Tale
Unfortunately for consumers, in the real world the right answer counts
more than accessibility and kindness--and for phone support, right answers were hardly the
norm. Only three stores--Comp-USA's Woburn outlet, and the Best Buy stores in Westminster,
Colorado, and West Covina, California--gave us outstanding service, pinpointing the
problem with our driver and promptly explaining how to reinstall it. More routinely, we
encountered techs who either came up with a time-consuming fix (reinstalling all software
from the Compaq QuickRestore CD, which overwrites all data on the hard drive) or were
simply stumped.
CompUSA's $24.97 phone support charge may not seem onerous, except when you consider that only three of the chain's five stores solved our problem--and two of those used the marginally acceptable QuickRestore fix. The two other chains, on the whole, were generous with their time. While Best Buy does not officially offer or charge for phone service, its techs still provided phone support when asked. But their advice failed in three of five cases.
Computer City advertises a standard charge of $2.49 per minute for phone support, but four of five stores didn't charge us. Unfortunately, a sweet deal turned sour in three cases, when suggestions from the chain's techs didn't help at all. The Denver outlet made matters worse, advising our reporter to delete an undamaged video driver. RadioShack's lack of phone support means that the chain offers no way for consumers to screen a problem: A simple software glitch could send your computer to the shop for a lengthy and costly stay.
| Phone Support Problem: Corrupted video driver | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chain | Accuracy of diagnosis/guidance | Cost | Efficiency | Helpfulness |
| Best Buy | Toss-up: Two stores nailed it, a third came up with a
marginal fix, and two failed. |
Can't beat it: No charge for support at any store. | Inconsistent: Techs at three stores were fast and
responsive, but with the other stores, we had trouble getting through or waited on hold. |
Inconsistent: Techs at two stores were courteous, one
store pushed us off to Compaq, and two had impatient and terse staff. |
| CompUSA | Tails--you lose: One store nailed it, two offered a
marginal fix, and two failed but charged us anyway. |
Pricey: $24.97 flat rate or $2.49 per minute. | Inconsistent: Three stores were fast, but two kept us
waiting on hold too long. |
Good: With one exception, techs were courteous and patient. |
| Computer City | Tails--you lose: One store nailed it, one offered a
marginal fix, two failed, and one left us worse off than when we started. |
Lots of freebies: One store charged $2.49 per minute; the others didn't charge, but two stores needlessly urged us to bring the systems in for service. |
Consistently good: Prompt attention, minimal waits on hold. | Inconsistent: Two stores were very good, while techs
at two others showed impatience and reluctance to help. |
| RadioShack | No phone support. | Not applicable. | Not applicable. | Not applicable. |
In the Shop: Litany of Errors
Overall, RadioShack was the least effective chain--generally inefficient and unhelpful, it failed to fix our cable problem three times out of five. Not a single RadioShack store fixed both the cable and the SIMM problems. Two RadioShack stores eked out C ratings--the others flunked. Computer City scored only a bit better: Three stores passed marginally; only one of those fixed both the bad cable and the misplaced SIMM.
CompUSA and Best Buy bettered this record slightly: Nearly all their stores got strong marks for helpfulness, and two stores from each chain performed well on many aspects of the consumer experience. But the rest performed terribly: Only two CompUSA stores fixed both problems; none of the Best Buy shops did so.
"We'll Have to Get Back to You..."
Average repair times ranged from about 3 days for Best Buy, to 6 days for CompUSA and 10 days for Computer City. RadioShack averaged more than 14 days per machine. This was primarily due to the chain's cumbersome system of transporting all machines dropped off at local stores to centralized service centers for repair. RadioShack executives have acknowledged this weak spot. (In fairness, the faster chains' stores sometimes suggested that we replace working parts. Had we elected to follow this bad advice, the repair process would have taken longer.)
Diagnostic Ineptitude
Worse, when a store botched the cable problem diagnosis, it never ended up fixing it. Our reporter's experience at the CompUSA store in Framingham, Massachu- setts, was alarmingly typical: "Over the telephone, the technician said he'd seen my disk controller failure 'a million times a day' and it meant I needed to replace the hard drive. I really had to wrestle with him to accept the machine for a hands-on diagnosis." When the tech finally relented and agreed to diagnose the problem in the shop, he proceeded to recommend a new motherboard.
That part-replacement mentality quickly became familiar. None of the chains offer commissions that might encourage replacement of serviceable parts, but stores in every chain--three RadioShacks and two from each of the others--tried to convince us to replace parts that were in perfect working order. This could merely have been incompetence. It may also have been deliberate efforts to sell unneeded components or services.
Peddling Unneeded Parts
Although our reporter left strict orders with the Best Buy store in Willow Grove, Pennsylvania, not to replace any part without permission, the techs went ahead and installed a new motherboard anyway. "On the plus side, they replaced my old motherboard and its 150-MHz Pentium CPU with one using a 166-MHz Pentium," our reporter noted. "The entire process was an exercise in incompetence mixed with what appeared to be good intentions."
After the tech at Best Buy's West Covina, California, store recommended a new hard drive, our reporter did everything he could think of--short of confessing knowledge of the precise solution--to help the store succeed. "How about trying the drive in another system?" our reporter helpfully suggested. The technician's reply: "I didn't hear the hard drive make any noise, you know, like it was working. So it's a goner." He insisted that a new drive would make things as good as new--without mentioning that all data would be lost.
The most perplexing of these cases took place at the RadioShack in Carlsbad, California. The store diagnosed hard disk failure and claimed to have replaced the drive--again, without our permission. When we checked the machine, the old hard drive was still there.
"Our records indicate that a hard drive was sent to Compaq in exchange for the new one," said Bob Kilinski, vice president for service at Tandy, RadioShack's parent corporation. "If the wrong drive was inadvertently sent, Compaq's system is not designed to make that distinction." Kilinski then added, "Such a widespread system [as RadioShack] can experience an individual problem...we always do our best to correct it."
That episode reflected the generally chaotic communications we found at RadioShack. In one case, the service center claimed to have transferred our PC back to the store where we left it, but the store didn't have it. The machine resurfaced a week later.
| Service Problems: Faulty cable and misplaced SIMM | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chain | Accuracy of diagnosis | Quality of repair | Cost | Efficiency | Helpfulness |
| Best Buy | Inconsistent: Three of five stores fixed the cable, and one fixed the SIMM. |
Inconsistent: Two stores made repairs without
incident. Two stores wanted to replace a motherboard or hard drive. Another tried to peddle an unnecessary backup service. |
Least expensive: $19.99 to $95. But one store billed
Compaq for unneeded motherboard and improperly charged us for labor. |
Inconsistent: Average turnaround about 3 days--but
that included botched diagnoses. Our beefs: time wasted holding on phone, one repair that took 15 days. |
Very good: Staff at all five stores were courteous, helpful, and patient. |
| CompUSA | Inconsistent: Three of five stores fixed cable, and three fixed the SIMM. |
Inconsistent: Two stores made repairs without
incident. Another fixed the system after we brought it back a second time. Two others tried to replace a hard drive or motherboard. |
High minimum: $89.97 to $99.97. One store wanted to
bill Compaq for an unneeded motherboard and hard drive. |
Inconsistent: Average turnaround about six days--but
that included botched diagnoses. Our beefs: missed deadlines, phone delays. |
Good: Most staff were courteous, helpful, and patient. |
| Computer City | Inconsistent: Three of five stores fixed cable, one fixed SIMM. |
Inconsistent: Two stores repaired PCs without
incident. Two tried to replace a motherboard or sell unneeded RAM. |
Wide range: $30 to $605. One store wanted to bill us
for a new motherboard. |
Consistently poor: Averaged ten days per machine. Our beefs: missed deadlines, phone delays. |
Mediocre: Techs were generally courteous and helpful but not always well informed. |
| RadioShack | Substandard: Two of five stores fixed cable, and two fixed the SIMM. |
Worst performer: Two stores repaired our PCs after
lots of trouble. Three tried to replace the hard drive or motherboard. |
Wide range: $39 to $720. One store wanted to bill us
for a new motherboard. |
Worst performer: Averaged 14 days per machine. Our beefs: slow service, poor communications. |
Poor: Techs courteous, but frequently ignorant about store policies and repair status. |
Fast and Loose With Warranties?
Aside from what appears to be at best an inaccurate claim to have
replaced a hard drive, there is another curious aspect to the Carlsbad RadioShack case. It
involves warranty repairs. The Compaq PCs used in our investigation were in fact still
under warranty. Our reporters, however, identified the machines as being out of warranty,
posing as worried consumers who expected to spend their own cash. To our surprise, several
stores took the initiative to check directly with Compaq, and learned that the machines
were indeed covered. (We authorized only one repair under warranty, although two other
stores replaced parts under warranty without our permission. PC World reimbursed
Compaq for all warranty expenses the company incurred as a result of this story.)
On the surface, a store's investigating warranty status looks like great service. But each time we encountered this apparently beneficial service, the store urged us to replace perfectly functional parts. You might shrug and think, "If it happened to me, why not go for it?" But a new hard drive means you lose your data. In all three of the cases where parts were replaced under warranty, we were charged for labor, even though the warranty covers labor. And in the long run, manufacturers pass along costs associated with warranty abuse by jacking up PC prices.
Danger Signs
RUSH TO JUDGMENT. Many of the stores' technicians made a firm--and incorrect--diagnosis before checking the problem thoroughly. Our reporters had to stand in long lines in many stores; pressure to move machines rapidly through the queue could partly explain the haste.
CARELESSNESS. Lapses in store oversight let bad assessments go forward unchallenged. (According to the Better Business Bureau, computer retail stores rank 7th worst among 327 types of businesses on number of overall complaints; however, the Bureau's data do not distinguish between sales and service problems.)
INEFFICIENCY. Some stores use disorganized or sluggish systems for moving and tracking products and communicating with customers.
Response From the Top
"I'm certainly not happy with any report that says customers are getting less than they deserve," said Nathan Morton, chief executive officer of Computer City, a Tandy subsidiary that may soon be spun off as a separate company. "But it's a very high priority for us to get it right."
"I don't challenge the results," said Paul Poyfair, CompUSA's executive vice president for services. "I'm obviously not very pleased." He then said, "We have 1500 techs across the country, and we've typically fared very well, but it's something that keeps [vice president for technical services] Rick Fountain and myself up at night." Poyfair added, "You can be assured that this will be something we focus on."
"Obviously, we're disappointed. It's very disturbing. I've already addressed [PC World's findings] with our people," said Tandy/RadioShack's Kilinski. "On the surface, it looks like someone made an assumption about a product based on past experience rather than checking carefully." But, he added, "we take customers seriously, and we take service seriously."
In defense of their stores, all the executives said that internal customer surveys indicate most people are happy with the service they receive. None of the chains would release the survey data to PC World.
The executives also argued that you can't expect flawless performance--PCs are very complex, and sometimes problems can't be reproduced in the shop, said Computer City's Morton. "But that's not to excuse anything. We want to be right 100 percent of the time."
CompUSA's Poyfair and RadioShack's Kilinski argued that their stores would have caught diagnostic errors if our reporters had, for example, permitted the techs to replace a hard drive or system board. They predicted that technicians would have caught the cable problems during the installation process. Our experience suggests otherwise. In one case--at the Computer City store in Pleasanton, California--we permitted the replacement parts to be installed. At the Best Buy store in Willow Grove, Pennsylvania, parts were replaced without our permission; and the Carlsbad RadioShack claimed (wrongly) to have made a replacement--again unauthorized. In no case was a misdiagnosis detected in the process.
Why did we have so many bad experiences? Is the problem mostly one of shoddy management and inept or careless technicians--or is there a training gap?
Root Cause: Training Lapse?
PC World learned from CompTIA, however, that of the 20 stores we tested, only 8 had more than half their techs certified A+; no Computer City and only one Best Buy repair facility had achieved this status. (CompTIA says that in some cases, A+ certified shops are not registered with them.) In any case, the distinction proved an unreliable indicator of skill. The average grades for the A+ certified stores were a D+ for our phone test, and a D for our in-shop test--barely better than the stores without overall A+ certification.
After encountering so many major errors, we naturally asked chain executives about their efforts to improve quality. Computer City is automating a system for gathering data on customer experience and for marshalling a response to problems. CompUSA says it will soon reward tech managers who score high on customer satisfaction surveys. "From time to time we will screw up, but we're trying to do everything we can to keep that to a minimum," CompUSA's Poyfair said. In light of PC World's findings, RadioShack may require a second tech to verify the need for expensive repairs.
Pay Your Money, Take Your Chances
But whichever service provider you choose, our experience suggests that a little homework can spare you major headaches and needless expense. When you buy a computer, look for one with a long warranty. Then get smarter about which problems really need fixing, and learn some troubleshooting skills. (For a head start, see the Troubleshooting charts, links at right.) When you need help, solicit referrals from friends and colleagues, and try your PC manufacturer's technical support line. You can also screen services through the Better Business Bureau. (For more tips on how to avoid exasperating and costly repair experiences, see Don't Get Taken: Checklist for PC Repairs.)
Of course, no single person will ever experience the barrage of frustrations met by our team of reporters. But consider this: At RadioShack, we faced less than a fifty-fifty chance of getting a problem corrected at a fair price, and the odds were barely better at the other chains. So unless you've gotten positive feedback about a specific store or checked its record, steer clear of the big four computer retailers. Our investigation suggests that if you must get a machine repaired, depending on the big chains is risky business.
Don't Get Taken: A Checklist for PC Repairs
Think Ahead
| Try online help. For common problems, check newsgroups such as alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt and comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware. | |
| Call your credit card company. Some automatically extend warranties for products bought with their card. |
Before the Repair
| Put a name-and-address label on your PC and monitor. | |
| Back up your data. | |
| Know your system's purchase date and its warranties. | |
| Record the serial numbers of major components. |
During the Repair
| Read all the fine print. | |
| Get written estimates. | |
| Arrange to get your original components back unless they are needed for a trade-in. | |
| Insist on authorizing every proposed repair, rather than giving the store a blanket okay. |
After the Repair
| Pay by credit card. The credit card company may intervene if disputes arise later. | |
| Get a signed list of what repairs were done. | |
| Check your PC's system memory and the component serial numbers to be sure you're not getting short-changed. | |
| Keep all receipts. |
If the worst happens, and you think you've been ripped off:
| First ask the department and store managers to make it right. | |
| Seek help from your local Better Business Bureau. | |
| Complain to the local district attorney or the state attorney general. |
--Laurianne McLaughlin
Charles Piller is executive news editor and Laurianne McLaughlin is a senior associate news editor at PC World. Additional reporting by Dean Andrews, Denny Arar, Steve Bass, Michael Desmond, Reid Goldsborough, Mike Hogan, Jane Morrisey, Randy Ross, Bill Snyder, and Scott Spanbauer. Test development by Jeff Kuta of the PC World Test Center.
Copyright © 1998 PC World Communications. All Rights Reserved.